Skip to main content

Term Time Leave

I am soon to go on my first term-time holiday for nearly thirty years. It's okay, I am allowed to, having retired from teaching in September, so there's no need to report me. It still feels a bit naughty, though. There are so many flights now that I don't expect the airport experience is going to be any less stressful, and my experience of planes is that the most challenging passengers tend to be below school age, but we shall see if anything is different.

One thing that is definitely not different is the price! I was expecting it to be much cheaper to go in June than in August, but maybe that is down to the fact that we have chosen not to go on a typical family beach-holiday. Out of curiosity, as cost is the reason given by parents 99.9% of the time, let's look at a more 'traditional' foreign holiday to see if there is any difference. Although I love Mallorca, it has some very family-friendly sites, so let's use it as our example.

I've picked a mid level, 'holiday village', with apartments rather than hotel rooms, as that is more likely to be the choice of a family. For a week, flying from Bristol on 25/6, it would cost a family of four £3162.28. It's all inclusive, so that seems reasonable. If we look at exactly the same trip in August, flying from the same airport on 16/7, the price increases to £4787. That is an increase of 51%. I am sure that there are holidays with higher and lower increases, but it is little wonder that families feel pressured to take holidays in term time.

With my headteacher hat on (I never actually had a headteacher hat, but it sounds like a good idea!) then I would say a week of absence from school was detrimental to a child's education and that parents who take their children out in term time should be fined. However, my feelings were, and remain, much more nuanced than that. Given the cost of the trip and the size of the fine, who can blame them. A fine will probably not stop them and it will just ruin your relationship with the family. I think that, if a child has a pattern of good attendance, that schools should turn a blind eye to the odd term time absence here and there. If we are talking about the difference between 97% and 95% attendance, is that really going to make a difference?

In my view, school focus too much on the attendance of children for whom it is not really an issue. They should, of course, be giving serious attention to those with poor attendance, but we are talking about two very different groups here. Overall, a slightly more relaxed attitude to term-time holidays would be a good thing for schools, but I can't see that happening any time soon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is 'teacher mode'?

The inspiration for today's post came recently during a walk around the town in which I live. I have spent the past two decades residing in what could loosely be described as a small but popular resort town, the type that only has a low-cost supermarkets in its centre. I was entering one of these recently when I came across a family who were clearly having an off-season break, probably in one of our many holiday-focused establishments. They didn’t actually say as much, but their 'city ways' certainly screamed this to all the locals present. The parents were obviously keen to pay for their purchases, but the children had not finished looking at sweets, so they did not follow them towards the till. As a result, the clearly annoyed mum turned and yelled to the children to get a move, using that old trick of using first and middle names as an indication of how serious they are about what they are asking. I don’t remember the name of the boy, but the girl was definitely called ‘...

Leadership Lessons - school relationships

The following post is taken from the manuscript for my still unpublished book. The book is designed as a manual for the new head teacher and the section I am including below is one where I describe the particularities and challenges involved in building positive relationships with different staff groups. I hope that you find it an interesting read and that some of it strikes a chord with your own experiences.

Why are schools obsessed with improving attendance?

I am fully aware that this post might be a bit controversial, but please read it in its entirety before judging me. It seems to me that the obsession that schools have with improving attendance at the moment is misguided at best and self serving at worst. Whilst regular attendance is of course what are looking for, I don't understand why are we spending so much time and energy trying to get attendance to 'above average' levels when that effort would be much better spent elsewhere. For a child, 94% attendance means missing about 8 days school over the course of the year. Younger children in particular are often ill and although the expectation on teachers is super high now we haven't quite got to the point where we are expected to provide a medical service. Sending letters and threatening families if attendance drops below 90% is not what we should be doing and the hard line on holidays in term time is a case of using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.  Surely there is room ...