Skip to main content

I was proud to be the head of a 'woke' school.

I really don't understand people who use 'woke' as an insult. As far as I can tell, it means being thoughtful, empathetic and inclusive, which doesn't sound like an insult to me. When I was a headteacher, my school was very much a 'woke' organisation, and I am proud to say that this was as much due to the attitudes of the children as to the example set by the staff.

We had pupils who identified as being transgender, families with same-sex parents, families from many different cultures, and our children quite rightly accepted everyone as being part of our school community. Perhaps the thing that made me the most proud, though, was the fact that when I became the headteacher there we still heard children using the word 'gay' as an insult, but by the time I left my school, that had disappeared entirely.

Knowing quite a bit about our families, I suspect that 'wokeness' was largely driven by our children making their own decisions about how they wanted to act, and their strong moral choices used to make me feel really optimistic about the future.

Thankfully, our country has not abandoned this approach, unlike our friends across the pond, who seem to have done so. It saddens me to see that the US Secretary of Defence has announced today, at the beginning of Pride Month, that he was ordering the US Navy to change the name of one of their ships from its current name, The USS Harvey Milk, to reflect something I think he is calling the 'warrior culture'. 

Now, Harvey Milk was a gay civil rights activist who served in the Navy, so it would seem very appropriate for a ship to be named after him. I don't know what they expect to happen with the name change. Are they expecting the boat to be better at war? 

I really hope we don't go down this route in the UK, and that Farage, our own mini-Trump, is found out before he gets any more political power. Even if he does, though, I have faith in our young people that they will be able to counter any anti-woke agenda. If the children of my school are anything to go by, we needn't worry too much.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is 'teacher mode'?

The inspiration for today's post came recently during a walk around the town in which I live. I have spent the past two decades residing in what could loosely be described as a small but popular resort town, the type that only has a low-cost supermarkets in its centre. I was entering one of these recently when I came across a family who were clearly having an off-season break, probably in one of our many holiday-focused establishments. They didn’t actually say as much, but their 'city ways' certainly screamed this to all the locals present. The parents were obviously keen to pay for their purchases, but the children had not finished looking at sweets, so they did not follow them towards the till. As a result, the clearly annoyed mum turned and yelled to the children to get a move, using that old trick of using first and middle names as an indication of how serious they are about what they are asking. I don’t remember the name of the boy, but the girl was definitely called ‘...

Leadership Lessons - school relationships

The following post is taken from the manuscript for my still unpublished book. The book is designed as a manual for the new head teacher and the section I am including below is one where I describe the particularities and challenges involved in building positive relationships with different staff groups. I hope that you find it an interesting read and that some of it strikes a chord with your own experiences.

Why are schools obsessed with improving attendance?

I am fully aware that this post might be a bit controversial, but please read it in its entirety before judging me. It seems to me that the obsession that schools have with improving attendance at the moment is misguided at best and self serving at worst. Whilst regular attendance is of course what are looking for, I don't understand why are we spending so much time and energy trying to get attendance to 'above average' levels when that effort would be much better spent elsewhere. For a child, 94% attendance means missing about 8 days school over the course of the year. Younger children in particular are often ill and although the expectation on teachers is super high now we haven't quite got to the point where we are expected to provide a medical service. Sending letters and threatening families if attendance drops below 90% is not what we should be doing and the hard line on holidays in term time is a case of using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.  Surely there is room ...